BCHD BoD 7-25-22 Ecomment VII.3) Properties Committee:
Nine of 12 BCHD potential Developer/Owner/Operators withdrew (75%) due to stated concerns about poor BCHD project economics and poor BCHD project design according to Cain Bros presentation. All three "finalists" have some form of alternative project proposed. It is s clear that BCHD and its designers and consulted have bungled the project until now and that the selected vendor will need to clean up BCHDs trail of errors. I oppose all recommendations of the non-objective committee that includes BCHD's project consultant Biro who has a conflict due to BCHD payment contract to his firm. I object to BCHD continuing to the CUP/PCDR/DRG phase due to its already demonstrated incompetence. The Developer/Owner/Operator needs to move ahead in an attempt to provide the fiduciary protects that BCHD refuses to implement.
BCHD BoD 7-25-22 Ecomment VII.3) Properties Committee:
Nine of 12 BCHD potential Developer/Owner/Operators withdrew (75%) due to stated concerns about poor BCHD project economics and poor BCHD project design according to Cain Bros presentation. All three "finalists" have some form of alternative project proposed. It is s clear that BCHD and its designers and consulted have bungled the project until now and that the selected vendor will need to clean up BCHDs trail of errors. I oppose all recommendations of the non-objective committee that includes BCHD's project consultant Biro who has a conflict due to BCHD payment contract to his firm. I object to BCHD continuing to the CUP/PCDR/DRG phase due to its already demonstrated incompetence. The Developer/Owner/Operator needs to move ahead in an attempt to provide the fiduciary protects that BCHD refuses to implement.