Meeting Time: November 17, 2025 at 6:00pm PST
Note: The online Request to Speak window has expired.
The online Comment window has expired

Agenda Item

II) Public discussion on items not on the agenda

  • Default_avatar
    Executive Director StopBCHDcom at November 17, 2025 at 4:59pm PST

    Mark Nelson (Home Gmail) <menelson@gmail.com>
    3:55 PM (1 hour ago)
    to Communications, Martha, Eleanor, Jane, Michelle, Noel, cityclerk, cityclerk, executiveoffice, info, City, citycouncil, James, Paige, chadwick.castle, brad.waller, Scott, zo, Kevin, rmiller, Robert, Monica.Suua

    Public Comment - All Agencies

    BCHD has no obligation to service non-residents
    BCHD therefore has no obligation to SUBSIDIZE non-resident services with resident-taxpayer funds

    Public Comment - BCHD, HB/RB/MB Mayors and Council, LALAFCO, LACo Board

    A BCHD employee during the Finance Committee meeting incorrectly stated that BCHD has an obligation to serve non-residents. It does not. Nor did South Bay Hospital with the exception of emergency room services that was the result of Hill-Burton obligations based on South Bay Hospital federal funding for construction. When the public hospital ceased to operate in 1984 and the building was leased, the obligation to Hill-Burton ended as well.

    Specifically at the BCHD LALAFCO MSR, the LALAFCO Commissions and Executive Director agreed that BCHD CAN RESTRICT SERVICES TO RESIDENTS-ONLY.

    Below is timestamped transcript result from the BCHD MSR meeting at LALAFCO.

    it (BCHD)
    1:09:48
    could impose residency requirements

    1:09:42
    of Beverly Hills there's often not residency tests although I believe it would be up to the district itself it
    1:09:48
    could impose residency requirements I know that there are certain libraries in certain cities that have residency
    1:09:55
    requirements that's not our jurisdiction that again would be the up to the district correct to decide if they
    1:10:01
    wanted to impose any kinds of residency requirements
    1:10:06
    is that correct Paul that is correct okay thank you