The CEO report continues to deliberately mislead the public.

1.The report omits that allcove is 91% non-resident/non-taxpayer Service Area (SPA8).
2.The report omits that allcove has an estimated negative cost impact and liability to District taxpayers of $175M across its 30-year obligated operation.
3.The most recent analysis (BCHD MDS) shows that 80% of the assisted living tenant prospects are from outside of 90254, 90266, 90277, and 90278.
4. The proposed PACE facility is 95% non-resident enrollees.
5. The bond measure funds will be $10M for the 91% nonresident service area allcove.
6. The bond measure funds will be $20M as a taxpayer payment for work that PMB had committed to conduct.
7. BCHD now uses land condemned for the benefit of the "residents who reside" in the District for 80% to 95% non-residents, similar to any commercial project.
8. As a non-resident servicing project, the HLC should have 0.75 FAR to minimize damages to surrounding neighborhoods
9. Public Meeting Attendance of 8 members of the public last month is abysmal. It is hard to imagine any LA County agency with lower public participation levels than BCHD.
10.BCHD conducted no financial analysis of the 30 year obligation of allcove on taxpayers. Hence an independent estimate found the cost at $175M using BCHD data and professional sources.
11. BCHD recovered only $2.9M of the $5.2M it spent on Covid. That spending was targeted at non-residents (84% non resident Covid services per LA County)
12. BCHD acceptance of $6M from the state for allcove's building was non-analyzed and cost taxpayers a $175M liability. BCHD should abandon the SPA8 service area and the funding for the structure.
13. BCHD failed to get resident voter approval for the $175M allcove liability for 91% non-resident service area.
14. Individual contributors are in contact with the County to author one or more documents regarding BCHD.

The CEO report continues to deliberately mislead the public.

1.The report omits that allcove is 91% non-resident/non-taxpayer Service Area (SPA8).
2.The report omits that allcove has an estimated negative cost impact and liability to District taxpayers of $175M across its 30-year obligated operation.
3.The most recent analysis (BCHD MDS) shows that 80% of the assisted living tenant prospects are from outside of 90254, 90266, 90277, and 90278.
4. The proposed PACE facility is 95% non-resident enrollees.
5. The bond measure funds will be $10M for the 91% nonresident service area allcove.
6. The bond measure funds will be $20M as a taxpayer payment for work that PMB had committed to conduct.
7. BCHD now uses land condemned for the benefit of the "residents who reside" in the District for 80% to 95% non-residents, similar to any commercial project.
8. As a non-resident servicing project, the HLC should have 0.75 FAR to minimize damages to surrounding neighborhoods
9. Public Meeting Attendance of 8 members of the public last month is abysmal. It is hard to imagine any LA County agency with lower public participation levels than BCHD.
10.BCHD conducted no financial analysis of the 30 year obligation of allcove on taxpayers. Hence an independent estimate found the cost at $175M using BCHD data and professional sources.
11. BCHD recovered only $2.9M of the $5.2M it spent on Covid. That spending was targeted at non-residents (84% non resident Covid services per LA County)
12. BCHD acceptance of $6M from the state for allcove's building was non-analyzed and cost taxpayers a $175M liability. BCHD should abandon the SPA8 service area and the funding for the structure.
13. BCHD failed to get resident voter approval for the $175M allcove liability for 91% non-resident service area.
14. Individual contributors are in contact with the County to author one or more documents regarding BCHD.